Featured Book

Doughnut Economics

7 Ways to Think Like a 21st Century Economist

Kate Raworth
Hardcover edition 2017

Review by George Kasabov
Contributing Writer

“Economics is broken. It has failed to predict, let alone to prevent, financial crises that have shaken the foundations of our societies. Its outdated theories have permitted a world in which extreme poverty persists while the wealth of the super-rich grows year on year. And its blind spots have led to policies that are degrading the living world on a scale that threatens all our futures.”

This challenge appears on the flyleaf of Kate Raworth’s book, Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist, and she begins her story with her student days, when she went to Oxford University to study PPE (Politics, Philosophy and Economics) in the expectation that this would provide a basis for understanding how to act well in the world. But, although she gained a first class degree, she was deeply disappointed with what she was taught.

She found that economics was based on a caricature of humanity. A caricature that bore little resemblance to the socially adaptable humans with whom we all live. Economists had adopted a pitifully restricted view, consisting of collections of lone individuals, each called “Rational Economic Man.” A man with a money bag in his hand a calculator in his brain, and an omniscient view of something called “The Market”. A market that was supposed to be unaffected by the fear and greed of his fellows. An isolated individual without connections or obligations to family, to place or to culture, whose only motivation is supposed to be rational self-interest. A competitive being, without regard for any harm his actions would do to fellow humans. All this says more about the nature of economists than it does about all other humans.

Rational economic man vs social adaptable humans

She also found that economists in the late 19th century, at a time when Newtonian science was held in high regard, set out to formulate their concepts to look like those of classical physics. They adopted this unsuitable methodology for describing the interdependent complexity of life, in order to gain a certain “scientific” respectability. They also increasingly restricted their sphere of discourse to factors which could be measured by money, ignoring factors which are essential to life, but for which no one pays in our society, such as the sun’s energy, family love and caregiving, compassion, charitable work and other voluntary effort (such as Wikipedia and Linux are now), or the absorption and regeneration of waste by the planet.

Finally she found that economists labored under the assumption that growth is essential for prosperity, a very questionable goal on our finite globe. But a goal which is accepted and advocated by academics, politicians and the media the world over.

About the Book’s Author: Kate Raworth is an economist whose research focuses on the social and ecological challenges of the 21st century. She is a Senior Visiting Research Associate at Oxford University’s Environmental Change Institute, and a Senior Associate of the Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership.

Capital in the Twenty First Century

Thomas Piketty

A leading economist documents the trend of income inequality through history, stressing that the way an economy functions is directly related to a power structure that is determined and maintained by the few who hold the wealth.

The Business of Changing the World

How Billionaires, Tech Disrupters, and Social Entrepreneurs Are Transforming the Global Aid Industry

Raj Kumar

In 2000, Raj Kumar and friends created Devex, an online community for global development that matches up organizations with funding opportunities and provides the largest database of grants, tenders, and other funding information. This book was written 20 years later to provide a clearer picture of how the aid industry operates, and where it’s headed.

Creating a Learning Society

A New Approach to Growth, Development, and Social Progress

Joseph E. Stiglitz

A Nobel economist and a leading finance expert posit the view that learning is more important to growth and development than the accumulation of capital. The traditional view of an inherently efficient free market, and of government regulation as the major source of economic difficulty, impedes the raising of a society’s standard of living by discouraging the production and dissemination of knowledge.

Further Reading

External Stories and Videos

Watch: Kate Raworth – Why it’s time for “Doughnut Economics”


Economic theory is centuries out of date and that’s a disaster for tackling the 21st century’s challenges of climate change, poverty, and extreme inequality. Kate Raworth flips economic thinking on its head to give a crash course in alternative economics, explaining in three minutes what they’ll never teach you in three years of a degree. Find out why it’s time to get into the doughnut…